The Importance of The Caves of Androzani

It won’t come as a great shock that many of us at the DWC are big fans of Robert Holmes; we’ve talked about him a lot in the past, and no doubt will again in the future. Although not his final Doctor Who story, The Caves of Androzani is certainly one of his best, and the circumstances that surround it, the development of the Doctor and Peri that had to take place within it, and the overall quality of the production results in Caves standing out as the best story of the Fifth Doctor’s era.

If we discuss the serials that shape the whole of Doctor Who – the tales that have lasting impacts on the show – then we’ll naturally turn to regeneration stories. Simply by their very nature, the shape of Doctor Who changes with each change of Doctor. But here, we have something unique. In a triumph of production management, The Caves of Androzani features not only the best script of Peter Davison’s tenure as the Time Lord; it is also packed full of some of the best guest actors of the era, the best location shooting, best soundtrack, and lighting and, lets face it, the best direction. The visual effects, too, seem to be better than anything in the previous five years of Doctor Who.

Yet this was just 12 months prior to the series’ cancellation.

While we’re not going to discuss that particular issue at this point, it is interesting to draw parallels. The differences between the Fifth and Sixth Doctor’s eras are stark as it is, before we even get close to discussing the change in tone, atmosphere, guest appearances, soundtrack, and costume. It could even be argued that the amount of effort that obviously went in to creating Caves should have been applied to the succeeding story, The Twin Dilemma, considering its importance in showing the series has a future.

But why, exactly, is Caves important? Well, for starters, it’s really, really good. In terms of its quality, it’s up there with The Seeds of Doom and Inferno, or even later classics like Remembrance of the Daleks or The Unquiet Dead. The script evokes with consummate ease a human colony civilisation, which features an ongoing dispute, gun-running, and political duplicity in to which the Doctor and Peri (Nicola Bryant) aimlessly stumble.

Holmes even increases the odds by giving us a race against time. Peri and the Doctor are both poisoned by the Spectrox nest. If the Doctor can’t find an antidote, they will both die. Add to this already dramatic mix the archetypes of Sharaz Jek and Trau Morgus, and the tension is electric.

They’re two of Robert Holmes’ most fascinating Doctor Who characters; Jek with his iconic mask, his army of androids, and his reserves of the most valuable substance in the nine galaxies Spectrox; and Morgus with his mines, his money, the gun-runners, and his captive audience. Extraordinarily compelling performances from Christopher Gable as Sharaz Jek and John Normington as Morgus stand out and provide superb texture to this story, and Doctor Who as a whole.

Graeme Harper’s direction has been largely ignored up to this point, so let’s have a look at a few key points. 1980s Doctor Who was, on the whole, bright lights and dry sounds. The country house in The Visitation is obviously a studio set. It’s lit like one, and it sounds like one. But while the rocky sets in Androzani are still recognisably sets, the way the lighting is expertly lowered and angled, and the audio reverb that is given to the scenes within the caves allows the viewer to immerse him or herself and care about what is taking place.

While all of these aspects come together in perfect synchronicity, there is still only one leading man, at least until Part Four. Peter Davison expressed at the time his reluctance to leave the show following the experience he had making his final story – but frankly, his performance here couldn’t have been bettered. His Doctor – young, inquisitive, energetic, and compassionate – is toned perfectly. As we reach the end of the story, his bravery underlines that the guns waved around by Stotz (Maurice Roëves) and his goons don’t make a hero.

The rescued Peri is still sick. Jek is dead. Morgus is dead. The mudbursts are coming. The Doctor is weakening, but he has the antidote: the milk of the queen bat, which he’s suffered considerably to obtain. He picks up Peri and carries her. The TARDIS is waiting and the mudbursts start. (It’s brilliant, isn’t it?! This man is about to die, and he’s risking his life to save a young Earth girl because he is responsible for her being there! Well, that’s his story.)

This brings us to the regeneration scene. It’s the end as far as we’re concerned, however. A rehash of the 1981 regeneration, simply, with an unnecessarily smug closing line from the new Doctor. This story ended with the Doctor querying “Is this death?” as he falls to the TARDIS floor, his body ravaged by the Spectrox Toxaemia. He only has enough of the antidote for Peri.

The Caves of Androzani is flawless storytelling. It’s superb direction. Atmospheric lighting, ambitious set design – and, above all, top quality Doctor Who. We wouldn’t see anything on this scale for 21 years. Twenty-one! This is why the story is so loved, admired, and remembered.

It is perfect.

(Adapted from an article originally published on Kasterborous in 2006.)

  • Simon Danes

    Absolutely. One of the best Doctor Who stories ever made. Note perfect and Davison is outstanding in it, too.

  • FrancoPabloDiablo

    Was going to say “welcome back Christian” but then saw it is an article from 2006. No matter, A great article nonetheless and more or less sums up everything great about the story. As close to perfection Docor Who has ever got. Less said about the Magma Beast the better but even Genesis Of The Daleks had THAT clam! Nothing is perfect!

    • Philip

      Mr C does hang around the DWC, don’t worry. He’s a bit like the Watcher. But more Northern. He has whippets in his wake.

      • FrancoPabloDiablo

        I’ve noticed his presence in the comments section in the recent past certainly. Just thought this was a brand new article. Going by the date it sounds like one just before I found Kasterberous hence why I didn’t recognise it. Like I say though, a great read. Even with the occassional few articles that are reproduced they are always worth another read and a nice reminder for those who read them first time round but have forgotten about them and fascinating for first time readers.

        Or maybe you guys are just getting lazy so rehashing old material! 🙂 Shame on you 🙂

        • Philip

          Our plan is to go forwards with a mix of old and new. Basically, so many of us have put in so much work into the K – and now, it’s offline, so those articles aren’t even accessible. So we want to share those pieces with new and old readers , sort of make the K’s database an important part of the DWC’s too. But yeah, don’t worry – we’ve got plenty of brand new stuff planned too 🙂

          • FrancoPabloDiablo

            Totally get your reasoning and completely welcome it. God help anybody though that is fooled by the ‘new’ Kasterborous site. Indeed, share the great content from Kasterborous to both us that were there and the newer fans that will be reading it for the first time. And don’t think all the time and effort you guys, past and present, have put in is not appreciated and respected. You all give us readers much joy.

          • Philip

            That’s lovely to hear – thank you, Franco 🙂

  • ColeBox

    Isn’t it rumoured that David Bowie was up to play Sharaz Jek? I’m quite split on this; on one hand it would have been incredible to have had Bowie in Doctor Who, but then the other reminds me that we wouldn’t have had Gable’s magnificent performance.

    • Jason Z

      It sounds like he was asked to play that role, and more besides – see e.g. http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2013-07-16/space-oddity-david-bowie-turned-down-doctor-who-says-composer-murray-gold/ . Actually I think it was recently revealed in a Watcher column in DWM that he was invited to play at least one other role too… can’t remember what it was now…

    • FrancoPabloDiablo

      Bowie was definately approached or considered. As a HUGE Bowie fan I am quite comfotable in saying I’m glad we got Gable. Can’t imagine anyone else, even Bowie, bettering that performance.

    • Robert Carnegie

      The comparison that comes to mind is David Bowie in “Labyrinth”, but actually that came later, just. With the manipulative behaviour and the creepy interest in the female lead. I’m guessing though that they wouldn’t put David Bowie in a leather mask that is removed to reveal his dreadful facial deformity. They could, but they wouldn’t.

      Did you see the comics where a character extremely similar to David Bowie is one of Matt Smith’s companions?? Generally addressed as “Jones” although I’d overlooked that he had a forename and it wasn’t David. But of course it should have been. Oh, and he’s dead.